Jul 112012
 

href="http://youtu.be/RgOh1qUcCRw"> src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Sling-Media-Logo-300x150.png?9d7bd4" alt="Sling Media Logo" title="Sling Media Logo" width="300" height="150" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4318" /> Sling Media’s SlingSupport channel released this video which helps explain the bandwidth requirements for SlingPlayer for streaming content.

While tech geeks likely already understand everything in the video, I think it is useful for the less technical user who may not understand why their streaming quality will vary when streaming from their Slingbox.

The video also clearly states the requirements for streaming in high quality (HQ) mode.

SlingPlayer for iPad and SlingPlayer for Android tablets require 800kbps over 3G or 4G networks, and 1200kbps over WiFi. SlingPlayer for iPhone/iPod Touch, SlingPlayer for Android phones, and SlingPlayer for Windows Phone requires 500kbps over 3G or 4G networks and 800kbps over WiFi. Note those are the minimum speeds required for streaming HQ, higher speeds will provide better quality. If you can’t get those speeds you should stream in standard quality (SQ) mode.

If you leave SlingPlayer it ‘auto’ it should figure it out and set the mode correctly.

width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RgOh1qUcCRw?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

Feb 232012
 

href="http://hd.engadget.com/photos/tivo-network-transcoder-hands-on/"> src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TiVo-Transcoder-Box-e1330044626501-300x276.jpg?9d7bd4" alt="TiVo Transcoder Box" title="TiVo Transcoder Box" width="300" height="276" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-9088" /> I’ve actually been working on a post about this for a little while, and on href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2012/02/23/tivo-reports-4q-and-fiscal-year-end-2012-financial-results-tomorrow/">today’s financial conference call President and CEO Tom Rogers provided the final piece. Last month at CES 2012 TiVo was showing off a transcoding box and EngadgetHD has href="http://hd.engadget.com/photos/tivo-network-transcoder-hands-on/">a very nice photo gallery of the unit (which is where I ganked the photo from). I didn’t report on it at the time since I wanted to gather some more info. Just before I left for my wedding & honeymoon I had a conversation with TiVo’s Public Relations Manager, Jessica Loebig, which filled in more info but left a few questions. She arranged for another conversation, with TiVo’s VP and GM of Product Marketing, Jim Denney, last Friday, just after my return. I’ve been a bit swamped catching up on life, and my day job, so more posts based on that conversation are forthcoming.

On today’s call Tom Rogers stated that the transcoding box would ship “later this year”, which I believe is the first firm public statement.

From a technical perspective, based on my conversations with TiVo, the unit that comes to market will probably resemble the unit previewed at CES, but it may not be exactly the same. It is planned to be an Ethernet only device, most likely installed near the router in the home. It will stream content from TiVo Premiere units using the same system as the Premiere-to-Premiere Multi-Room Streaming (MRS) available today. The content will then be transcoded to H.264 and forwarded to devices running TiVo’s client app – such as Android or iOS phones and tablets. Users will be able to view the streams in real time, or they can be saved on the device for later viewing – which is how side-loading is accomplished.

The hardware itself is powered by href="http://www.zenverge.com/">Zenverge, so it looks like href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/10/01/is-this-how-tivo-will-get-place-shifting/">my prior speculation was close to the mark. However, the unit is not planned to have MoCA. I asked Jim Denney about this and he said that MoCA was considered, but given the envisioned use case it was felt that the added cost wasn’t justified. And after discussing it with him, I see his point. Even if the TiVo units are on MoCA, that MoCA network will need to be connected to a non-MoCA network to reach the client devices. And that connection point is a logical place to connect the transcoding box. It doesn’t really make sense to connect it to the MoCA network when it’d have to send the transcoded signal back over the same network to eventually be bridged off to the client network. Keeping the unit dirt simple – just a power connection and Ethernet – keeps it small and keeps the component costs down.

From a capability standpoint, the unit can accept and transcode up to four streams simultaneously. And on today’s call Rogers made the interesting comment that it could be a recording, or LiveTV. I believe the latter is new. Today streaming is only between units that have their own tuners, either Premiere-to-Premiere or Premiere-to-Preview, so there isn’t a need to grab a tuner on the remote device for ‘live’ TV. But for those who want to watch live on a second screen device, it’d be a necessity. (As well as for another application that’s coming, but I’ll leave that for another post. src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif?9d7bd4" alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )

I asked about the streaming technology – is it based on Sling Media or Monsoon Multimedia, or anyone else? It is not. It is an in-house implementation using Zenverge’s silicon and developer tools. So it is unique, and the clients will come from TiVo. That gives me some hope. While Sling & Monsoon Multimedia treat their clients as a revenue stream, TiVo has been giving away their client software. And since you need a TiVo with an active subscription to use this transcoding box they have that revenue stream to draw upon. Rather than milking the customer for anther payment, I’m hopeful they will continue to provide the client software for free, relying on the sales of the hardware, and the TiVo subscription, for revenue.

If they do this it also makes me hopeful that they might publish the client APIs for 3rd parties to build support, as well as create clients for other platforms that aren’t Android or iOS. But that might be a bridge too far since I’m sure they’ll need to protect the content to keep the content owners happy, and that means they couldn’t tell others how to decrypt.

From my conversation with Jessica & Jim, the current plan is for streaming within the home, with side-loading for ‘on the go’ viewing. But not for place shifting streaming content outside of the home. Jim & I talked about this for a while, since I’m a long time Slingbox user and for me streaming beats side-loading hands down. He made the valid point that side-loading has some popular use cases – the most obvious is for when streaming isn’t an option, such as on an airplane. I know parents also use it to load up a bunch of their kids’ favorite shows to whip out on demand to pacify them, etc. So I’m not going to argue against side loading. It isn’t a use case that really interests me, but I acknowledge that it is valid.

As far as streaming outside of the home, Jim was sure to stress that it has not been “designed out” of the product. It isn’t currently planned, but it is something that could be added if there is demand. A lot of the concern is over quality of the experience, bandwidth requirements, etc. I made the point that I’ve been using a Slingbox since I had 768kbps upstream ADSL and only 2.5G EDGE data on my phone, giving me maybe 200kbps if I was lucky, and it was usable even with 320×240 resolution. And these days I have a 5Mbps uplink and 4G LTE on my phone, which has a 720p screen and HDMI output capabilities.

I’ve streamed HD video from my Slingbox PRO-HD from Worcester, MA to Seattle, WA and viewed it on my laptop while I’m out there for work. Being able to access my personal content at home, in real time, while I’m on the road just can’t be matched by side-loading. So I’m strongly in favor of TiVo enabling remote streaming as well. I argued that bandwidth costs continue to drop as speeds continue to increase, and device capabilities have never been greater. Now more than ever before streaming is viable.

I felt it was a good discussion and that TiVo is very much open to feedback on this issue. So it’d be good to hear from the user base. Do you want remote streaming? Or does local streaming and side-loading meet your needs?

No pricing or specific release dates are available at this time, so I can’t comment on that. But if they can bring this to market at a decent price point I think this would be very attractive, especially if they add remote streaming. By way of comparison, the href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/10/10/directvs-nomad-now-available-does-copying-not-streaming/">DirecTV Nomad is $149, but you also need to subscribe to the Nomad Mobile DVR Service. My impression of this TiVo unit is that it is a one-time purchase, so it may retail for more than the Nomad. By while the Nomad is strictly store-and-forward side-loading, with real-time transcoding, the TiVo unit does streaming and side-loading, and it sounds like it will transcode for side-loading in better than real time.

I, for one, would be very interested in getting my hands on one of these units.

Feb 232012
 

href="http://youtu.be/eFEjqat5y0A"> src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Sling-Media-Logo-300x150.png?9d7bd4" alt="Sling Media Logo" title="Sling Media Logo" width="300" height="150" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4318" /> Over a year ago href="http://www.slingmedia.com/get/pr-verison-us.html">Sling Media announced a deal with Verizon Wireless to rent a Slingbox to Verizon Wireless customers for uses with their mobile devices. Instead of buying a Slingbox at retail users would be able to rent a Slingbox from Verizon for a monthly fee. href="http://hd.engadget.com/2011/01/07/exclusive-verizon-slingbox-in-the-wild/">EngadgetHD even got photos of the unit, href="http://support.slingbox.com/go/slingbox-120">a Slingbox 120, at CES 2011. But after the announcement and sighting at CES 2011 it seems like nothing new appeared, and everyone just forgot about the deal or presumed it fizzled.

That is, until today. EngadgetHD’s Richard Lawler called my attention to this video,“Introduction to the Verizon Slingbox Subscription Plan”, posted yesterday by Sling Support: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eFEjqat5y0A?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

According to the video the Verizon Slingbox Subscription Plan is available now, for a $49.99 deposit and $9.99/month – plus taxes and shipping. You get a Slingbox 120, Slingbox player software for your Verizon mobile device (which is not the same as the generally available SlingPlayer app), and ‘accessories’. I href="http://support.slingbox.com/get/KB-2000434.html">found this FAQ on Sling’s website, which indicates the ‘accessories’ amount to a pair of SlingLink TURBO powerline network adapters – also seen in the video. The deposit is refundable if you cancel the subscription and return the hardware.

The video states that the subscription is available if your have a 4G LTE device, but the app doesn’t seem to be available on my Verizon Galaxy Nexus nor my wife’s Verizon Droid RAZR. The FAQ indicates the supported phones are the HTC Thunderbolt, Samsung Droid Charge, and LG Revolution, while the video explicitly mentions the Thunderbolt, Charge, and the Motorola Droid Bionic – but not the Revolution.

Since the phones mentioned are all last year’s models, and this hit out of the blue, I left the following comment on the video:

This was announced last year, and the FAQ on Sling’s site? (support.slingbox.com/get/KB-2­000434.html) seems out of date – the phone models listed are all last year’s models. Is this actually launching now? Which phones are/will be supported? I don’t see the app on my Verizon Wireless Galaxy Nexus, which is 4G LTE.

Somewhat surprisingly, Sling Support responded quickly thusly:

Good point, but that FAQ is actually accurate. We have a limited roll out right now and are evaluating other VZW models as they come to market.? Thanks!

If the flagship 4G LTE phones aren’t supported it does seem to be ‘limited’, but hopefully they’ll expand this to newer models rapidly. It certainly seems to have been a very quiet launch. Not only did we miss any sign of it, but I can’t find any mention of this service anywhere on the Verizon Wireless website. And even the Sling Media website is pretty much limited to the old 2011 press release and the FAQ. It doesn’t seem like either party is doing much to publicize this option.

What about you? If you have a Verizon 4G LTE phone, especially a model not listed above, is this available to you? Would you take this over just buying a Slingbox outright? A Slingbox SOLO is currently href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000VXKD8K/?tag=tiv-20">$162.02 at Amazon, and SlingPlayer for Phones is $29.99, so you’d be looking at just over $192. That’s about 19 months worth of subscription fees (I won’t count the deposit since that’d refundable). Personally I think buying a Slingbox at retail is a better deal in the long run.

Feb 222012
 

href="http://youtu.be/Sw50nh8rmSk"> src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Sling-Media-Logo-300x150.png?9d7bd4" alt="Sling Media Logo" title="Sling Media Logo" width="300" height="150" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4318" /> Sling Media today released a slew of videos in a “Get to Know SlingPlayer for [insert platform here]” series. The current generation of clients are very nice, so it is good to see them promoting them. It would be nice to see a new generation of Slingbox hardware though.

Android phones: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Sw50nh8rmSk?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen> /> Android tablets: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TbQjK5uZapc?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen> /> Kindle Fire: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PPkrdLsJQ9U?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen> /> iPhone: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FUC6y7jEFYI?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen> /> iPad: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9WEG43uaGMg?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen> /> Windows Phone 7: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rWrfLRurcFE?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen> /> Web: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-EDqBGvzr4I?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>

Nov 212011
 

href="http://www.slingmedia.com/get/pr-slingbox-android-tablets-us.html"> src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Sling-Media-Logo-300x150.png?9d7bd4" alt="Sling Media Logo" title="Sling Media Logo" width="300" height="150" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4318" /> The release of href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/11/18/slingplayer-for-facebook-now-available/">SlingPlayer for Facebook reminded me that I never shared this news. I meant to post this a month ago when href="http://www.slingmedia.com/get/pr-slingbox-android-tablets-us.html">the press release came out, but got busy and didn’t get back to it. Sorry about that.

Like all recent SlingPlayer Mobile clients SlingPlayer for Android Tablets only works with the Slingbox SOLO and PRO-HD, older Slingboxes need not apply. If you have a SlingLoaded Dish Network ViP922 DVR or a Sling Adapter with your ViP722 you do not want to use this, you want the free href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.sm.SlingGuide.Dish">Dish Remote Access app.

href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.slingmedia.slingPlayerTablet">SlingPlayer for Tablets is designed for Android tablets running Android 3.0 Honeycomb or later. It is not to be confused with href="https://market.android.com/details?id=com.slingmedia.slingPlayer">SlingPlayer for Phones, which is meant for devices running Android 1.6 or later. Yes, Sling has produced two different clients and not one unified client that works well on both platforms. (While you can run the phone client on a tablet it isn’t optimized for the larger screens.) That means two $29.99 purchases for those with both types of devices.

I’m not sure which client is best for phones running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, like the Galaxy Nexus. On the one hand some phones now have higher resolution displays – qHD or 720p – equal to many tablets, just physically smaller. And the OS has the features to support the tablet player. I suppose you can try the tablet player out and use the 15 minute return window for a refund if it doesn’t work well. Leave a comment and let us know how it works if you try it.

Back before the release Sling posted this video preview: /> width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tniJpENDdOM?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>